Skip to main content

THE KISS OF BETRAYAL

THE KISS OF BETRAYAL

As I continue to ponder over several concerns in comparison to the writings of the scriptures, with respect to the way life should be ordered, the contrast I see is so great, as if we are moving 100 miles per hour in a wrong direction. I am caught in the mesh of thought; either to emulate the prevalent models or live the life portrayed by the Master – Jesus Christ, in my work of life. I have so many examples, which are far from the truth in that they “have a form of godliness but denying the power thereof,” as Paul tells his protégé, Timothy, to beware. But also these seem to have great following, hence, the contraption, “results silence arguments.”

Today, I will try as much as I can to look at the kiss of betrayal. Why did Judas have to kiss the Master for the high priests to identify Him? Did Jesus look the same as the disciples? Did His dressing seemingly not set apart from those of His followers? Were the high priests so dumb that each time they saw Him they had amnesia? Or were they so rich that they needed to throw some coins around? What was really their difficulty in identifying with the person of Jesus? As I beg to ask those questions in relation to what is written in scriptures in comparison to the present day models, could the high priests ever dare to need someone to kiss Him again? Seeing He now rides in a private jet, exotic cars, crocodile skin shoes, body guards, three piece suits, etc.

It is amazing how we have perfected the deviation from the truth and even built teachings around them and hope to be understood and show defiance against those who dare bother to speak the truth. If the church is supposed to reflect the typology of shepherds and flock relationship, how come many of the shepherds are barricaded with high tech security? Between the sheep and the shepherd who needs security? That awkward moment when “the flock” does not have access to shepherd, what kind of relationship should that be likened to?

The shepherds are now so anointed that the anointing needs to be secured by mere mortals. Who was more anointed, a Man of God, than Jesus, yet people were always “flocking” around Him? How did we get here that to see some of the shepherds you will definitely need to book an appointment, even make some payments to access them? Are these really shepherds or CEOs? While it is required that a shepherd smell like a sheep, is this the case today. How many of you reading this now, at least, smell like your shepherds?

I look at the examples that the life of Jesus leaves us with and how we do not seem to be anything close, and I ask again, are we really His brethren with the same genetic makeup and spiritual identity? Has mutation occurred leaving off cell lines of varying genomes? How true could the words of John be when he says, “As He is, so are we.” If He is the chief Shepherds, how come the today’s shepherds are not following his examples?

In a bid to answer some of these questions, there is need to analyze the progression of these anomalies:

The shepherds have evolved into CEOs

The CEOs now see the sheep as meat.

The meats are sold because they are Grade A.

The demand for Grade A has created a Market.
The market has created businesses.
The businesses have to be run as corporations.
The corporations have to be headed and funded.
The funding and running will require more meat fro them to be sustained.
The requests for more meat will require the killing of the sheep silently.

The silent killing will require the use of deception.

The use of deception will require the devil.

The devil will activate his ministry of kill, steal and destroy.

This is the story of the evolution of the shepherds into CEOs.

Can the present day shepherds be betrayed by a kiss? Do they smell like the sheep? Are they within the flock they were given to tend? Yet, some claim to have been blessed, hence the need to upgrade. Anyways, a shepherd is only a shepherd because of the flock. Remove the flock; he is CEO selling Grade A meat.

The earlier we get back to the basics, the better for us. If you are the sheep, then follow the shepherd; and if you are the shepherd, then tend the sheep. Jeremiah prophesies, thus:

Jeremiah 3:15

15 "And I will give you shepherds according to My heart, who will feed you with knowledge and understanding.

And after Jesus resurrected and was about to ascend to the Father admonishes Peter thus:

John 21:15-16

15 ¶ So when they had eaten breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, "Simon, son of Jonah, do you love Me more than these?" He said to Him, "Yes, Lord; You know that I love You." He said to him, "Feged My lambs." 16 He said to him again a second time, "Simon, son of Jonah, do you love Me?" He said to Him, "Yes, Lord; You know that I love You." He said to him, "Tend My sheep." 17 He said to him the third time, "Simon, son of Jonah, do you love Me?" Peter was grieved because He said to him the third time, "Do you love Me?" And he said to Him, "Lord, You know all things; You know that I love You." Jesus said to him, "Feed My sheep.

I make a clarion call to all those who have taken the responsibilities to be shepherds to rise up to the occasion and play the role they have been assigned to by design so much so that it would require the kiss of betrayal.

Elvis C. Umez
#PurposeConsultant

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DYNAMICS OF INFLUENCING YOUR COLLABORATORS

DYNAMICS OF INFLUENCING YOUR COLLABORATORS In the just previous essay I pointed out the three major right attitudes the leader must have in his or her bid to influence the collaborators, which are: he or she must always come up with superior argument, be grounded in wisdom and knowledge, and be proactive in proffering solutions that make problems go away. However, today, I am going to be discussing the dynamics of influencing the collaborators and the point of influence associated with them in the progressive transformation of the cycle of leadership. In the cycle of leadership, the leader is given a goal to transform followers who got attracted to them by the leadership vision into becoming disciples who by a series of teaching learning of the principles that make for good leadership are transformed into collaborators who have eventually discovered their leadership purpose and are willing to either sustain the work being done by the leader or are launched out as leaders in order to ...

The Decision Factor

In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you can do is nothing. - Theodore Roosevelt “The value of decisions depends upon the courage required to render them. The great decisions, which served as the foundation of civilization, were reached by assuming great risks, which often meant the possibility of death.” “The majority of people who fail to accumulate money sufficient for their needs, are, generally, easily influenced by the ‘opinions’ of others.” Were the words of Napoleon Hill, in his book, Think and Grow Rich. He continued, “They permit the newspapers and the ‘gossiping’ neighbours to do their ‘thinking’ for them. ‘Opinions are the cheapest commodities on earth. Everyone has a flock of opinions ready to be wished upon anyone who  will accept  them. If you are influenced by ‘opinions’  when you  reach DECISIONS, you will not succeed in  any undertaking ...

LEADERSHIP REFELCTIONS 19

The spectator syndrome has the most devastating effect on any leadership whose pioneer leaders allow the crowd to tell them what to do and what not. This syndrome creates the same effect created by back seat drivers who believe they know how the driver should drive. They talk with so much proficiency that could make you consider their suggestions, which is rather a distraction in a kind. Pioneer leaders should understand that distractions only come because they are focused and should never allowed themselves to be diffused into the words of those suffering from the syndrome. Every leadership is navigated by a game plan that only the leaders see. While it could be suggested that they are not doing what they are supposed to, it is important to note that their perceptive in the field of play differ from those standing aside and observing. In the football field, there could be a million spectators, yet only 22 players touch the ball. The players who score the most goals understand how to...